<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t take the easy way out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dennmart.com/2007/01/30/dont-take-the-easy-way-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dennmart.com/2007/01/30/dont-take-the-easy-way-out/</link>
	<description>Official Blog of Dennis Martinez</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 01:45:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wil Sinclair</title>
		<link>http://www.dennmart.com/2007/01/30/dont-take-the-easy-way-out/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Wil Sinclair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 12:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dennmart.com/2007/01/30/dont-take-the-easy-way-out/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I just posted my experiences while installing QmailToaster at http://www.wllm.com/node/21 . Since this project is based on qmail, everything must be compiled, which can (and does) complicate the install process somewhat. I found myself wishing that I could yum or apt-get all this stuff more than a few times.
While I don&#039;t typically compile my software to optimize performance on my system and I&#039;m quick to sacrifice the latest version for an easy install, I can see the value of doing this. But no need to sacrifice a package manager for compiling if the srpm&#039;s are available. Also, I&#039;ve found that software configuration and/or placement in the system is much more problematic in packages than compilation options or any other compile-time decisions. Ultimately, the package is only as good as the packager has made it- lots of packages just aren&#039;t quality efforts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just posted my experiences while installing QmailToaster at <a href="http://www.wllm.com/node/21" rel="nofollow">http://www.wllm.com/node/21</a> . Since this project is based on qmail, everything must be compiled, which can (and does) complicate the install process somewhat. I found myself wishing that I could yum or apt-get all this stuff more than a few times.<br />
While I don&#8217;t typically compile my software to optimize performance on my system and I&#8217;m quick to sacrifice the latest version for an easy install, I can see the value of doing this. But no need to sacrifice a package manager for compiling if the srpm&#8217;s are available. Also, I&#8217;ve found that software configuration and/or placement in the system is much more problematic in packages than compilation options or any other compile-time decisions. Ultimately, the package is only as good as the packager has made it- lots of packages just aren&#8217;t quality efforts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.040 seconds -->
